District & Ninth Circuit Justices & Staff Attorneys Be Impeached For Corruption and Fraud On The Court?
Should District & Ninth Circuit Justices &
Staff Attorneys Be Impeached For Corruption and Fraud On The Court?
San
Francisco, August 20, 2018
Courts
across the country, including the Ninth Circuit, come down heavily against private entities for
non-compliance with the ADA [disability] law. However, when roles are reversed,
and when denial of ADA accommodation claim is against their brethren, i.e. the
state court, which as a public entity is covered by the ADA statute, Federal
Judges and staff attorneys overtly took steps to bury the claim, corrupt the court, whose judges/staff attorneys allowed defendant to author Federal Court
orders/decisions, compromising their integrity, all of which constitutes a
fraud on the court.
Sources
reveal that an 88 year old disabled appellant widow had the courage to file an
ADA claim against the Santa Clara County, California State Superior Court. The
California Judicial Council, who oversees the defendant, allegedly “judge
shopped” and moved the case to a favorable/compromised Federal District Court Judge
Ronald M. Whyte, who has had major conflicts of interests with the defendant state
court, including his last employment being with the very defendant, and his
spouse depending on her livelihood from defendants, admitted to be so, by Judge Whyte.
Other
judges on the Norther California District, San Jose bench like Edward Davilla, Lucy Koh, Beth Freeman, all
voluntarily recused from taking this case.
After
the ADA claim against defendant state court was buried and dismissed at the
district court, with orders authored by defendant under Judge Whyte’s name, and
upon appeal, the 88 year old appellant got the same treatment, where the
defendant state court had the law clerk of Ninth Circuit Justice panel of Friedland, Christen, and Silverman, summarily [without merits] dismiss the
appeal, without any good cause, despite appellant lodging a code-complaint
opening brief. Either Friedland, Christen, Silverman & Co. are in cahoots with the defendant/California Judicial Council or they are recklessly oblivious of fraud being committed on the court in their name.
 |
| Judge Michelle Friedland |
 |
| Judge Barry G. Silverman |
 |
| Judge Morgan Christen |
See
court the July 16, 2018 court filing, para. Ҧ1.2 Shocking Dismissal With
Prejudice”.
“To the entire
worlds’ surprise, including this Court’s own staff and senior office bearers
[evidence available upon request], the “DA” initial panel attorney compromised his/her
position, by permitting the defendants to kill this appeal, as they did at the
lower district court. In other words, to deprive appellants from having their
day in court.
The “DA” [initials] attorney
dismissed the two appeals without offering any reasons, referring to “See
9th Cir. R. 42-1”, #35, and premising it on appellee’s motion which was
never served on 88 year old, disabled appellant, who is not registered for
e-filing.
This leads to a
logical inference that the dismissal of appeals no. 17-15086 & 17-15087 was
not in good faith, and a fraud on this court
See
also the same filing, para. “¶2.1.4. Appellants “Locked Out”;
Deprived Their Day In Court, At District Court & Now At Appellate Court”
“Appellants are locked
out, both at district court, and at appellate court. For pro se appellants
doors of justice are bolted shut If not opened, appellants will be forced to
take justice into their own hands
The issue is whether the legal profession
is independent of, competent, free from special interests influence, to
adjudicate over its brethren courts and legal profession. When lower federal
court orders are confirmed as authored by defendant state court entity
California Judicial Council and its agents, it calls into question whether the monopoly
over, and the keys to deciding the fate of United States citizens’ can be
entrusted to the courts/law profession.
In recent past, public trust in judiciary
is at an all-time low. This Court’s failure to rein in corruption that flout
the congressionally enacted recusal statutes not only further erodes public
respect in this court, but renders the existence of this court meaningless,
hollow and a sham”
See
also the same filing, para “¶3.3. The Appeal Is Compromised/Fraud On The Court”
“The “DA” [initials] panel
attorney’s office has been compromised. Given the long history of fraud on the
court, where lower court’s orders are authored by defendant, so admitted by
lower court judge Ronald M. Whyte, it is not surprising that defendant are
doing the same here, to blockade the issues on appeal from being heard/decided
on merits.”
See
below, where in a subsequent filing titled “Motion/Writ to Remand for “Fraud on
the Court” With Referral To Authorities”, co-appellant details the fraud on the
court, including Ҧ3. Conflict Of
Interest(s)”, “¶4. Both Federal Cases
Usurped by Judge-Whyte”, “¶5. Fraud on the Court”, “¶5.1 [Court] Orders Authored/Engineered Under Judge
Whyte’s Name [by defendant/its agents]”. The above filing accompanies affidavits of individuals who have witnessed and heard Judge Ronald Whyte admit to the fraud on the court. Please click the link below
Appellants’
begged to let the U.S. Department of Justice participate as a real party of
interest, but the miscreants refused to let any outsider participate, let alone, intervene, which demonstrates
corruption, retaining sole control, cover-up.
President
Donald Trump’s nemesis, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, headed by
Judge Sidney Runyan Thomas, earlier, refused to take action against Federal
Judge Ronald McLeod Whyte’s misconduct simply because the latter took the “escape-route”, by taking an “inactive” status, a.k.a. retirement, after the misconduct was brought to light . See “Federal Judge’s
Retirement From Bench Erases His Judicial Crimes While On The Job? Taxpayer On
The Hook To Still Pay The Judge’s Salary For Life”, http://judgetsmoneyforlifeaftercrimes.blogspot.com/2017/04/federal-judges-retirement-from-bench.html
 |
| Chief Judge Sidney THomas |
 |
| Ex-District Court Judge Ronald McLeod Whyte |
Every
time a judge’s misconduct surfaces, instead of punishing the perpetrator of misconduct, the judge/justice simply takes the "escape route", retires keeping the full life-long
salary/taxpayer paid benefits. See for e.g. 9th Circuit Justice Alex.Kozinski,
disgracefully forced out Dec. 18, 2017,
after “disclosed sexual misbehavior exceed[ing] three decades”, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Kozinski
 |
| Ex-Judge Alex Kozinski |
Countless judicial misconduct public complaints have been made against Federal Judges, for
e.g. see http://judicialirregularities1.blogspot.com/2016/11/california-judicial-council-corrupting.html. The Ninth Circuit is doing nothing to
rein in the judicial misconduct, but rather encourages them with cover ups. For
example there has been no instance of Ninth Circuit ever going
after a single case of judicial misconduct, although countless misconduct complaints have been
filed with the Ninth Circuit, see http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/misconduct/
The
Law profession certainly knows how to protect/take care of its members, regardless of
the crimes complained of.
In
sharp contrast,on rare occassions legislature has held judges
accountable for misconduct, for e.g. entire Virginia Supreme Court Justices impeached
for fraud, corruption, et al., https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/14/politics/west-virginia-supreme-court-impeach-trnd/index.html
The
public is growing increasingly frustrated with the attorney profession, a
relatively small percentage of the overall population, monopolizing and
cornering the market on this country’s justice system, raging havoc, with
life-changing orders against ordinary citizens.
No
profession in this world oversees/adjudicates crime/corruption committed by its
very clan/members/brethren, the former oversight ends up being a sham. Here crimes against courts, are decided by, you
guessed it, the very entity/courts that are charged with those crimes in the
first place.
An
independent judicial oversight is sorely needed otherwise “absolute powers
corrupts absolutely”.
Keys
to judicial business, making fatal decisions over public, should not be given
to the law profession exclusively, when latter has corrupted the process.
The
law profession has not learned Superman’s motto, i.e. with great power comes
great responsibility. Law profession, that masterminds and controls the judiciary, has
wielded/misused that “great power” for ulterior motives/gains.
Please
direct your comments and queries to drainjudicialswamp@gmail.com
Comments
Post a Comment